JIRA Project Types
JIRA offers two main ways to build a project: team-managed and company-managed. Each type balances freedom against control in a different way. A good choice at the start saves hours of rework later.
Layman's View: Food Stall and Restaurant Chain
A team-managed project works like a food stall. The owner picks the menu, sets the prices, and decides the opening hours alone. A company-managed project works like a restaurant chain. Head office writes one rulebook, and every branch follows it.
TEAM-MANAGED (Food Stall) COMPANY-MANAGED (Restaurant Chain)
+--------------------+ +------------------------+
| Project Team | | JIRA Administrator |
| sets its own rules | | writes the shared rules|
+--------------------+ +------------------------+
| | |
Project A Project B Project C
Team-Managed Projects
Team-managed projects keep every setting inside the project itself. A project admin changes issue types, workflows, and fields without asking a JIRA administrator. Setup takes minutes, which suits small teams that want to start fast.
- Settings stay private to the project.
- Project admins control the board, workflow, and fields.
- Other projects cannot reuse the same configuration.
Company-Managed Projects
Company-managed projects rely on shared schemes. A scheme is a saved set of rules, such as a workflow scheme, an issue type scheme, or a permission scheme. JIRA administrators build each scheme once and attach it to many projects. A change to one scheme updates every project that uses it.
Large companies prefer this model. Reports stay consistent, and every team speaks the same language.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Team-Managed vs Company-Managed Projects
| Feature | Team-Managed | Company-Managed |
|---|---|---|
| Who controls settings | Project admin | JIRA administrator |
| Setup speed | Very quick | Slower, needs planning |
| Sharing configuration | Not possible between projects | One scheme serves many projects |
| Customization depth | Basic to moderate | Deep and detailed |
| Best for | Small, independent teams | Large, process-driven organizations |
| Company-wide reporting | Limited consistency | Strong consistency |
Project Templates
Both types start from a template. A template preloads a board, a workflow, and issue types that match a common way of working. Teams adjust the pieces after creation.
Common JIRA Project Templates
| Template | Purpose | Good Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Scrum | Plan work in fixed-length sprints | Software teams that ship in cycles |
| Kanban | Move work through a continuous flow | Support and maintenance teams |
| Bug Tracking | Record and fix defects | Quality assurance groups |
| Business Project | Track tasks outside software | Marketing, HR, and finance teams |
How to Choose
Two questions decide most cases: who owns the project, and whether other teams need matching rules.
Start | v Does one team own the project alone? |-- Yes --> Team-Managed | No | v Do several teams need the same rules? |-- Yes --> Company-Managed | No --> Either type works. Pick the quicker setup.
Real-World Example
Small Design Studio
A studio with six designers tracks client work in JIRA. Every client project needs the same four steps: Brief, Design, Review, Delivered. The studio owner creates a team-managed project and edits the board in ten minutes. Nobody waits for an administrator.
Software Company with Forty Teams
A software firm runs forty teams that follow one release process. The administrator builds a single workflow scheme with code review and testing stages. Every project attaches to that scheme. Managers compare progress across teams without translating different status names.
Switching Between Types
Moving a project from one type to another can involve extra steps. Issues may need to move into a new project, and some settings may not carry over. Planning the type at the start avoids that effort.
Common Mistakes
- Choosing company-managed for a tiny team, which adds paperwork without benefit.
- Choosing team-managed for a project that later needs company-wide reports.
- Skipping the template choice and building every setting by hand.
Summary
Team-managed projects give speed and local control. Company-managed projects give shared rules and consistent reporting. Templates provide a ready starting point for both. A quick look at team size, ownership, and reporting needs points to the right choice.
